Rajesh Pandey
Observing that the culture of frequent strikes gives a bad name to the legal profession, the Allahabad High Court has directed all the district judges of Uttar Pradesh not to circulate any resolution for strike calls passed by the Bar Associations in the respective district judgeships (district courts).
A division bench comprising of Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra and Justice Gautam Chowdhary passed this order when it was brought to its notice that members of the bar association are routinely passing resolutions calling for strikes and thereafter, the district judge circulates resolution of strike to all of the Judges, as a result of which, most of the courts rise leaving the litigants in lurch not knowing as to what is happening.
In addition to it, the court expressed hope and trust that lawyers in the district courts would follow the resolution of the state Bar Council to hold a condolence meeting at 3:30 p.m. so that the entire day’s work is not obstructed.
“We are at a loss to understand why only in the state of Uttar Pradesh the lawyers have to call condolence meet at 10:00 a.m. and thereby obstruct the court working for the whole day. The judiciary is already facing a backlog of huge cases for disposal and any further delay caused due to strike or condolence is wholly uncalled for”, the court added.
During the court proceedings, KR Chitra, advocate on record before the Supreme Court, who appeared to assist the court in the present matter, stated that occasionally she appeared before the district judgeship at Gautam Buddha Nagar and was often being harassed on account of frequent strike calls made by the lawyers in the court. She further alleged that unfortunately some of the advocates were indulging in activities other than what was expected of them, at the cost of their professional duties, as a result of which the reputation of the legal profession itself was being harmed.
Expressing concern over her submission, the court reiterated that it is high time for the lawyers to self-introspect their act of calling strikes and restore the faith of common citizens, and the lawyers regain the glory of the noble profession.
“We are conscious that most lawyers throughout the districts are opposing the idea of strikes, and it is a handful of lawyers who at the drop of the hat, resort to strike in utter disregard of the law declared by the Supreme Court”, the court added.
The court in its order dated September 25 directed to list this case again on October 22, 2024. The court also directed that by that time, a report would be submitted by the registry of this court in terms of the previous order passed by the court.
